Investigation finds Gainsborough homes at risk of flooding

The Chancellor George Osbourne duing his visit to Leeds Station.  13 January 2012.  Picture Bruce Rollinson
The Chancellor George Osbourne duing his visit to Leeds Station. 13 January 2012. Picture Bruce Rollinson

More than 750 new homes in Greater Gainsborough are at significant risk of flooding, an investigation has found.

The investigation, by Greenpeace, has found that nearly half the areas earmarked for fast-tracked housing development by a flagship government scheme, have a high risk of flooding, making thousands of new homes potentially uninsurable.

The sites targeted UK-wide by a recent house-building drive unveiled by Chancellor George Osborne include two areas threatened by the latest floods and others which were inundated during previous emergencies, according to the investigation.

And at least 750 houses are planned in 15 sites around Gainsborough.

Greenpeace’s findings will raise more questions about the government’s approach to flood risk management amidst growing controversy over delays in the construction of flood defences for existing homes in areas hit by flooding in Cumbria and Lancashire last week.

Earlier this year, the Chancellor announced a flagship housing scheme which saw 20 brownfield sites around the country designated as new ‘housing zones’, with local councils given access to money and experts to expedite the building process.

Greenpeace UK researchers used details obtained through Freedom of Information requests to plot the location of these housing zones, and cross-referenced this with flood risk maps from the Environment Agency.

They found around nine of the 20 zones, comprising a total of 9,000 planned new homes, are in areas now identified as being partially or fully at risk from flooding.

Under the terms of a new government flood-insurance scheme soon to be implemented, these properties would be excluded from cover. This would leave homeowners reliant on commercial insurers who may choose not to insure homes built in flood zones, or do so at prohibitively expensive rates.

A spokesperson for Flood Re confirmed that properties built from 2009 onwards in flood-risk areas are still excluded from the government scheme.

He added: “It would be irresponsible to incentivise developers to build in such areas simply because those properties could have their insured flood risk ceded to Flood Re.”

Greenpeace also obtained figures showing that the number of people employed by the Environment Agency to work on Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management fell by 230 – a 5% cut – in the last three years. The agency plays a key role advising councils on flood risk.

Dr Doug Parr, chief scientist at Greenpeace UK, said: “The current flood emergency isn’t even over yet, and the government is already storing up the next one. Rushing to build thousands of new homes in flood-risk areas whilst at the same time cutting flood protection staff is a recipe for disaster.

“David Cameron’s lofty rhetoric at the UN climate summit is helpful, but if he’s serious about protecting Britain from the impacts of climate change, these words need to translate into climate-savvy policies on the ground.

“When it comes to energy, flood defences, and other big infrastructure projects, we need the government’s hands to start following what the government’s mouth is saying rather than acting of their own accord.”